Thursday, 19 February 2015

'Muzaffarnagar Baaqi Hai' or 'Muzaffarnagar Eventually'

(Hindi with English subtitles)

Film Screening and discussion

Tuesday 24th February, 7.00pm

Room V211, SOAS Vernon Square Building,
Vernon Square, Penton Rise
London WC1X 9EW


On the thirteenth anniversary of the Gujarat genocide, with the survivors still waiting for justice, we invite you to the UK premiere of this powerful film about a horrific new ‘laboratory of Hindu Rashtra’ and how it is being resisted.



In September 2013, an anti-Muslim pogrom took place in the Muzaffarnagar and Shamli districts of Western Uttar Pradesh in which more than 100 men, women and children were killed and some 80,000  displaced.  In the past, these two districts had seen relative harmony between Muslims and Hindus. What happened this time? ‘Muzaffarnagar Baaqi Hai…’ (Muzaffarnagar eventually...) explores this question examining the many facets of the massacre- the question of  women’s ‘honour’, which was used by organisations of the Hindu right, including BJP-RSS, to orchestrate communal violence,  the merging of caste identity politics within the larger Hindutva fold, the breakdown of the once powerful farmers’ union, the Bharatiya Kisan Union, whose survival hinged on the unity of Hindu and Muslim peasants,  the various aspects of Dalit politics in the districts, the dubious role of the Samajwadi Party, the ruling party in Uttar Pradesh and the feeling of complete alienation and marginalisation of the Muslim community. The film looks at how the massacre found its resonance in the 2014 Indian General election campaign. Finally, it tells of the continued and growing resistance in Muzaffarnagar and Shamli districts against the corporate-communal nexus. 

Muzaffarnagar Baaqi Hai  Nakul Singh Sawhney/2014/135 mins/Hindi with English subtitles


Nakul Singh Sawhney's earlier films include the award winning With a little help from my friends (2005),  Agaurav and Undecided, both in 2006,  Once upon a time in Chheharta and the acclaimed Izzatnagari Ki Asabhya Betiyaan (2012) on “honour” crimes in Haryana

Monday, 16 February 2015

Colonial Misogyny and Women's Activism in Palestine - Possibilities for Transnational Solidarity




How do the Israeli state's colonial strategies specifically target women?

What are the various forms of resistance in which women in Palestine are engaged?
How can we extend and strengthen initiatives for transnational solidarity

Dr Rania Masri

 Associate Director Asfari Institute for Civil Society and Citizenship, American University of Beirut

Monday 2nd March 2015, 7-9pm
Rm B111 Brunei Building, SOAS Thornhaugh Street, Russell Sq
 London WC1H OXG

Rania Masri is a social-justice and anti-war activist.  Her writings and activism have centred on the occupation of Palestine, and the struggle against apartheid and racism.  She has also written and organized extensively on the sanctions on Iraq, and civil and environmental rights.  A partial listing of her writings and talks can be found on her personal website: http://greenresistance.wordpress.com/my-writings/

Organised by Freedom Without Fear Platform, Decolonising the Mind SOAS, SOAS Students' Union and SOAS Pal Soc


Monday, 26 January 2015

Reflections on gender violence, neoliberalism and the Hindu Right

A panel discussion with Tanika Sarkar and Kavita Krishnan

6.30-8.00 pm, Thursday 12 February 2015
Khalili Lecture Theatre
SOAS, University of London
Thornhaugh Street, Russell Square, London WC1H 0XG



Eminent feminist historian Professor Tanika Sarkar and leading feminist and left activist Kavita Krishnan will reflect on multiple forms of gender violence in India, both in the recent past and under the current government of Narendra Modi, the challenges faced by those confronting this violence, and how it has been affected by India’s neoliberal policies and the rise of the right-wing political forces of Hindutva.

Tanika Sarkar is Professor of Modern History in the Centre for Historical Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi. She has published extensively on women and the Hindu right, cultural nationalism and the politics of Hindutva, as well as social reform in colonial and postcolonial India.  
Kavita Krishnan is secretary of the All-India Progressive Women’s Association (AIPWA). She is also editor of ‘Liberation’ which is the monthly journal of the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist).

Co-chaired by Navtej Purewal (SOAS South Asia Institute) and Kalpana Wilson (LSE Gender Institute).


Organised by SOAS South Asia Institute and LSE Gender Institute in collaboration with Freedom without Fear Platform

Monday, 17 November 2014

Britain’s population policies are fuelling atrocities like India’s sterilisation camp deaths


The full horrors of the deaths by sterilisation of poor women in Chhattisgarh are continuing to emerge. At least 14 women have died so far and more than 50 women are struggling for their lives. This is nothing short of a massacre.

Relatives of the victims have revealed that the women were forcibly taken to the camps by health officials. They were operated on in appallingly unhygienic and unsafe conditions in an abandoned private hospital close the Chief Minister’s residence.  The doctor, RK Gupta, who performed 83 operations in 5 hours, had been given an award on Republic Day this year by the Chhattisgarh government for conducting a record number of sterilisations of women. In this case, the deaths appear to have been caused by poisoning by contaminated medicines which the women were given after the operations. 



Indian feminist and left activists are demanding: 
  • Action against Chhattisgarh’s Health Minister and resignation of the BJP Chief Minister Raman Singh.
  •  A moratorium on the Indian Government’s policy of sterilisation as a form of family planning, and the use of sterilisation targets (which although discontinued at national level are still set by a number of states in India)
  • A review of the whole ‘family planning/population control’ framework.
  • Expansion of women’s access, through informed choice, to a range of safe methods of contraception, with non-invasive methods being promoted instead of surgery
See more at http://www.aisa.in/poor-women-herded-death-name-family-planning-chhattisgarh/

Britain’s population policies are fuelling atrocities like India’s sterilisation camp deaths


By Kalpana Wilson


The horrifying deaths of at least fourteen women after undergoing surgery at sterilisation camps in Chhattisgarh, one of India’s poorest states, highlight the ongoing violence of the population control policies which the British government is at the forefront of promoting globally. Far from giving poor women in the global South much-needed access to safe contraception which they can control, these policies dehumanize them as ‘excessively reproductive’ and set ‘targets’ which make atrocities like those of Chhattisgarh possible. And while these policies are rooted in deeply racist and patriarchal ideas they are now implemented in the name of reproductive rights and ‘choices’.

Two years ago, the British government and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation which has been instrumental in influencing Britain to take the lead on population issues hosted the London Family Planning Summit. Along with USAID, UNFPA and other international organisations, they announced a $2.6 billion family planning strategy. A few months later Development Secretary Justine Greening announced ‘determined UK action on family planning’: on top of existing drives to get 120m more girls and women in the poorest countries to use ‘voluntary family planning’ by 2020, further initiatives would include the increased distribution of contraceptive implants.


Despite its insistence that it opposes coercion, it had already been revealed that Department for International Development(DfID) aid was helping fund forcible sterilisations in the Indian states of Madhya Pradesh and Bihar in which, as at last Saturday’s sterilisation camp, poor women, many from Dalit castes, died after being lied to about the operation, threatened with loss of ration cards or access to government welfare schemes, and bribed with small amounts of cash, and then operated on under appallingly unsafe conditions, to meet targets set by the government.

Sterilisation of women has long been the main method used in India’s population control policies. During India’s “Emergency” in the mid-1970s, with civil liberties suspended, men were forcibly taken to similar camps for vasectomies but this generated massive opposition contributing to the historic electoral defeat of the Congress party in 1977. Research conducted in 2005-06 suggested that around 37% of married women had under gone sterilisation. Officially recorded deaths caused by sterilisation between 2003 and 2012 translate into 12 deaths a month on average, and actual figures may be much higher. In 2012 a Human Rights Watch Report warned that without a change of policy on sterilisation, the commitments made by the Indian government at the London Family Planning summit would lead to further abuses and increased pressure on health workers to meet targets.

Britain’s support for the mass sterilisations of poor and marginalised women which characterize India’s population policy is covert – but many of the contraceptives which DfID and its corporate partners more openly promote also deny women control and put their lives in danger. Feminists in the global South and feminists of colour in North America and Britain have campaigned for years against unethical testing of new drugs, and the dumping of unsafe injectable and implantable contraceptives, like Depo-Provera - which is being coercively administered to Ethiopian women in Israel - Net-En, and Norplant.


The Gates Foundation has been repeatedly criticized for its close relationship with pharmaceutical giants, and its role in financing drug trials and vaccine programmes which were found to be unethical and unsafe. These include a clinical trial of the HPV vaccine against cervical cancer manufactured by Glaxo Smith Kline and Merck Sharp and Dohme in India in 2009, falsely claimed to be a ‘post-licensure observational study’, for which 23,000 girls aged 9-15 from impoverished communities were selected and requirements for parental consentwere bypassed. The trial was suspended following the deaths of seven adivasi (indigenous) girls aged between 9 and 15.


DfID’s current initiative with Merck involves promoting the long-lasting implant Implanon to ‘14.5 million of the poorest women’ by 2015’. Implanon was discontinued in the UK in 2010 because trained medical personnel were finding it too difficult to insert, and there were fears about its safety. As well as debilitating side-effects, the implant was reported as ‘disappearing’ inside women’s bodies. Merck has introduced a new version Nexplanon, which is detectable by X-ray, but have been allowed to continue to sell their existing stocks of Implanon. This is the drug which is being promoted in DfID and UNFPA programmes in the ‘poorest’ countries, despite these countries’ huge deficit of trained health personnel. In fact, in Ethiopia, one of the target countries, mass insertions of Implanon are part of ‘task shifting’ where hastily trained health extension workers are being made to take on the roles of trained doctors and nurses.


Like earlier versions dating back to Malthus, current approaches to population are based on shifting responsibility for poverty away from capital and onto the poor themselves. Population growth in the global South is being linked to climate change, shifting attention from the role of carbon emissions in the North, and is held responsible for the escalating food crises generated by land grabbing by transnational corporations and foreign governments. While population control is argued to be linked to declining maternal mortality and improved child survival rates, this cannot be achieved without a change in the dominant economic model which could make substantial investment in health provision possible. But current population discourse insists that the World Bank and IMF-imposed neoliberal policies in which health provision, along with education, sanitation and other essential public services, has been decimated since the 1980s, can remain in place. Tellingly, erstwhile Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell described population policies as ‘excellent value for money’ citing the example of Tanzania which he claims would ‘need 131,000 fewer teachers by 2035 if fertility declines - saving millions of pounds in the long run’.


Today population control is in fact part of a broader strategy of global capital in which women’s labour is extended and intensified, with responsibility for household survival increasingly feminised, and more and more women incorporated into global value chains dominated by transnational corporations. It is this, not concerns about rights and choices, which underpins the policies like those of DfID and the Gates Foundation which deny women in the global South real control over their bodies. Increasingly, women are demanding ‘reproductive justice’, which involves exposing this strategy and confronting structures of power and inequality, as the only way of preventing more deaths like those in Chhattisgarh.



Wednesday, 17 September 2014

Support the Sheikh Sisters Struggle for Justice!

Pack out the court room at Gloucester Crown court on 29th September 2014! 

No more racist attacks!


On 31st March 2014, Gloucester Crown Court was forced to order a re-trial of Mark Ridler and his partner Charlotte Mace for a racially aggravated attack on the Sheikh sisters on 28th August 2012.


The Sheikh sisters are four young Asian women living in Gloucester who were subjected to a horrendous campaign of racist abuse by a neighbouring white family and their racist friends which started in 2009. It included besieging the sisters in their house, constant racist abuse, and threats to kill.

The sisters reported the abuse to the police and local authorities on numerous occasions but no action was taken. In fact, hate crime protocols were ignored. The racists openly boasted that they had contacts with the police who would protect them.

As a result Mark Ridler, Charlotte Mace (along with Mark’s mother) felt emboldened to launch an extremely violent attack on the sisters on 28th August 2012. The sisters were so seriously injured that one of them had to be hospitalised with serious head injuries, which now, two years later, still require treatment.

Stop the Crown Prosecution Services and Police colluding in a travesty of justice

  • In a travesty of justice both the police and local authority have refused to treat the sisters as victims and have conducted no effective investigation.
  • The Crown Prosecution has colluded in this cover up and this vicious three year campaign of racist abuse has been treated in court as an isolated incident. Vitally important evidence about the prolonged and continuous racial harassment and intimidation which were part of this campaign of racist harassment were not made available in court.  
  • No proper specialist medical assessment of the sisters' injuries was organised by the police or CPS.


The sisters had to provide their own photos taken on their own mobile phones. In court the barristers representing Ridler and Mace were allowed to abuse the sisters accusing them of lying and claiming that it was they who attacked the racist gang. The Judge even questioned the sisters about their commitment to the UK. They were not able to view their own court case and were forced to leave the court after they gave evidence. Requests for them to be accommodated in a safe space in the court were refused. They were told they could sit in the public gallery (with the racist family & friends) or go home! Despite the way the case was conducted, because of the sisters' courage and determination to pursue the truth, the all-white jury refused to acquit the racists and did not reach a verdict.

The Judge and CPS have been forced to order a retrial which is due to take place at Gloucester Crown Court on 29th September 2014. Pack out the court room for that retrial. Support the Sheikh sisters!


For details of transport from London email: freedomwithoutfearplatform@gmail.com

Thursday, 17 July 2014

Aderonke Apata from the Lesbian Immigration Support Group, Manchester, speaking at Women Resisting the Racist ‘Security’ State Meeting

3rd July, 2014 

Aderonke Apata speaking at the meeting

I am honoured to be here to speak to you about what LBGT people face, people who are asylum seekers in the UK, people who have been persecuted back in their countries of origin and thinking they are coming to the UK for sanctuary. Instead, when they get to the UK they are criminalised again, having to go through the same problems that we went through whilst we were back at home. Platforms like this are an opportunity for us to raise awareness amongst people so that they know what’s happening. 

Therefore I would like to speak about the work of the Lesbian Immigration Support centre in supporting lesbian women, bisexual, transgender people. We give social support to people when they go to court. When we go to interviews, LBGT asylum seekers are asked very intimate questions, questions which you don’t want to share with people, things you don’t want anyone to know about. They [immigration authorities] keep asking people to answer such questions. But even when you answer such questions they are still not satisfied. This has led to desperate situations where people have had to prove their sexuality to immigration officers by recording scenes making love with their lovers in the bedroom and sending them to immigration officers to say that this is my proof to say that I am a gay person. I think that this is wrong. Even with heterosexual people you don’t need to prove that, so I don’t think we should be subjected to that kind of inferior treatment because it is degrading for us to go through. Even when we do all that, there is always something wrong, they will always pick up something out of your evidence to use against you. Such a catalogue of wrong doings the Home Office is doing against LBGT people. This is a time for people to speak out, this is a time for people to resist this racism and homophobia, there are a number of campaigns against this treatment all around the country, you even have different individuals campaigning against this.

In a Channel 4 report way back in March, Theresa May announced that she would be reviewing the immigration system when it comes to the interviewing of LBGT asylum seekers. I am glad this is happening. They have been going around the country to meet with LBGT asylum seekers, collecting evidence of people's personal experiences to see how they can change their policies. They had these guidelines before but they did not follow them. 

What we are saying to them is this. We want staff to be properly trained with diversity issues. We want them to apply sensitivity when it comes to dealing with cases of LBGT people, because this is quite intimate, it’s not what you want to talk to people about. In the UK people are lucky and I am lucky here as I can express myself the way I want. Back in my country and in other countries from where people have come to seek asylum here, it is not an easy thing, you can’t even mention it to a friend of yours, so whatever you are going through you have to bottle it up. But they don’t know all this, they don’t take them into consideration when they are carrying out these interviews and making these decisions against us. It makes it very, very difficult. Even if they do know, because they need to keep down the immigration numbers, they just don’t want to look at it. So with campaigning, with everybody talking about it they are coming in the direction in which we think they should be coming. I hope that by September when this report is out it will influence policy in such a way that they will change the way they interview asylum seekers when it comes to sexuality claims.

However, it’s not just about the interviewing and decision making, for the people who have been persecuted back home, or even myself, after having been arrested and tortured back in my country I was kept in a detention here for over a year. And,  it’s not just me, we have so many people who have been through that detention centre. There is a scene of going back, so I am going through the same again. I am being locked up again for being who I am. For nothing more, and it's the same for anyone else who has come from Uganda, Nigeria or any other country because they are LBGT people. We have mental and psychological effects that people face every day as a result of people being locked up, they have lost their relationships, they have lost their families, lost everything they have got and people are still kept in detention. At the end of the day some of them will be released into the community, because not everyone in the detention centre will be deported. So why do they have to take us through that torture in the first instance, can they not deal with our cases while we are out there in the community, why do they have to lock us up? I see that as injustice, I see it as the state wanting to suppress people from fighting against them or fighting for their own rights and the rights of other people. 

There has been so much talk about detention centres. On the 21 June I think it was, we had a big demonstration in Manchester to shut down Yarl’s Wood detention centre, and that was not the only demonstration that has been going on, even inside Yarl’s Wood there has been a demonstration to shut down Yarl’s Wood which I was part of in 2012. There are so many detention centres around the country and people are pressing for them to get shut down. I believe and I know that detention is not the solution. Some people are pressing for change of management of detention centres in the wake of this scandal that has come up with SERCO staff sexually abusing detainees, exploiting people’s vulnerability and I think it is horrendous that all this is happening in the UK. People are pressing for change of management, but I don’t think a change of management will do anything because there is a culture and that will still come back whoever gets the contract even if it’s not SERCO, it will still come back. So what we are talking about is a total shut down of all detention centres. They can do what they want to do while we are out in the community, they don’t have to lock us up.

The surveillance for us is massive, they will ask us to come to reporting centres, we go there to sign, what do they do, they detain us. If you don’t go to sign and you are caught up somewhere you will still be detained. So you don’t know which way to go, you don’t know whether you should abide by the rules or not, you don’t know what you are doing is right, all this makes us think we are in the wrong, but we are not. While thinking about this means people are having depression, mental and psychological problems, even physically people have been abused in detention centres. We have seen male guards abusing females in detention centres and we don’t think that is right at all. So that is why you see a campaign, I ask you please join in, although it may not concern you directly, there might be a friend of yours or a neighbour of yours that might have someone in a detention centre. 

It is said that detention centres should be used as a last resort for deporting people, but how do you justify keeping people in detention centre for one, two, three years, how do you justify that? I can’t see the rationale. It is not the last resort. Therefore detention centres are not fit for purpose, we don’t want them at all. Each time we have a voice to raise we talk about what is a happening to LBGT and other asylum seekers. There are people who are here for political reasons, others who are here because of FGM and so many other reasons why they left their countries, they are treated in the same manner. I was just talking to somebody about a BBC report last night, where every fifteen minutes they were running this news about FGM and it makes me laugh. There was a family with a high profile campaign who was deported back to Nigeria about two or three months ago. This lady, she had two female children and she was saying that if she was deported, her children would have to undergo FGM, she had an online signature campaign of maybe about 200,000, she was supposed to be taken on a Virgin airline plane, even the director of Virgin spoke against it and refused to fly her, he spoke out against the FGM. The government is talking today that people should report FGM, any professional in this country who does not report back to the government would have to go jail, which means the government knows there is FGM going on outside this country and even within this country, so why are people being deported? That’s why I said I was so amazed when I heard it last night. I couldn’t digest it.


It’s the same thing with everyone else seeking asylum. This government is always commenting on how these other governments are abusing Human Rights in Syria etc. But what is happening here in this country? I feel this is the reason we need to stand up against the state, to let them know that what they are doing is injustice and we don’t want it to happen. If we don’t stand up they will continue to do what they are doing as if it’s alright. The Summit [global summit to end sexual violence in conflict 10-13 June] that happened last month, I attended it, I was just looking at William Hague when he was talking about rape and condemning these countries that rape women during conflict. Yes, they should be condemned because it is violence against women. But what about Yarl’s Wood that has over 400 women locked up for two or three years, they are subject to violence, and that is happening here in the backyard, and nobody is talking about it. People have been pressing for a public enquiry into that place. They are going to have an enquiry but it is not public. Two years ago when it went public they pretended as if they knew nothing. Now, because so many people are shouting about it, they are talking about it in the media, they cannot ignore it. That’s why they are calling for an inquiry. 

We need, as individuals and organisations, to come together and begin to push for a change, push for freedom, push for justice. It might take a long time, but I believe we can achieve it. If we know that this is what we want and we want to go for it, we will get there, because the freedom that I am enjoying today some other people fought for it so many years back, probably when I was not even born. So if we are doing what we are doing today and if we are not seeing the result with time even if you cannot see it another generation may enjoy it. That is my message for you all. Thank you.

Tuesday, 8 July 2014

Calls to action following Women Resisting the Racist Security State Open Meeting

Thank you all who came to the FWFP open meeting on July 3rd 2014. Special thanks to our speakers who all provided unique perspectives on the struggles for a more meaningful justice.

We will shortly post a more detailed account of the meeting and contributions from the speakers. In the meantime do have a look at the following websites which relate to Aderonke and Sarah's talks:



Kamila and her family were really moved by the support of the people at the meeting and were really encouraged by the messages of support and solidarity. We are working with the sisters to build a campaign of support and will update you in the next two weeks with the next steps. In the meantime:
  1. FWFP is looking to organise buses to Gloucester on the 29th September from London and from Birmingham. If you would like to contribute to the costs of this and/or travel on the bus please get in touch with us directly at freedomwithoutfearplatform@gmail.com. We are an unfunded group so would need a critical mass and contribution to afford the bus hire – once we have campaign materials, we will email these out and ask you to circulate widely so that the sisters have some solidarity on the day.
  2. For people who want to be in touch with the MP in Gloucester, his details are here: http://richardgraham.org/ . We will be drafting a template letter for people to send to Mr Graham and will send this out with the campaign materials in the next couple of weeks.
  3. For people who want to be in touch with the Sheikh sisters to arrange your own solidarity actions directly, please email freedomwithoutfearplatform@gmail.com with your phone number and some details of who you are and why you are wanting to get in touch (the family is understandably cautious of who they provide their details to so please provide as much detail as you can and we can forward directly to the family to respond).