Here in
Britain we are facing a racist and increasingly repressive state, which
hypocritically claims concern about violence against women while ruthlessly
cutting away what few resources still exist for women's struggles against gender
violence, and attempting to destroy the possibilities for women to autonomously
and collectively organise against violence. Doing away with preventative
measures or escape routes for women facing life -threatening situations, the
British state now disempowers women completely, literally silencing them as
their cases are handed over to a racist and increasingly privatised criminal
justice system run by corporates like G4S and Serco, well-known for their own
violence against women from Britain to Palestine. This combination of repression
and corporate profits which are at the centre of Britain’s current gender
violence policies is inherent in neoliberal capitalism.
In 2014 we
will face an attempt to criminalise Forced Marriage in the face of massive
opposition from the vast majority of BME women's organisations and feminist
groups.
In
continuing to build resistance to these attacks, and to strengthen solidarity
with movements like the ongoing anti-rape movement in India, we are also
committing ourselves to making visible
- the resistance to rape and violence against women in India and elsewhere - against a tide of racist representations which seeks to erase these struggles and portrays women outside the West and women of colour in the West as victims waiting to be saved.
- the endemic nature of gender violence in Britain, including that of the state, and the struggles against it - against victim-blaming and demonising of 'culture'.
- the historical and ongoing effects of imperialism and global capital accumulation which underpin, reinforce and intensify gendered violence and injustice - against the normalisation of war, occupation, incarceration and neoliberal plunder.
As Kavita
Krishnan points out in her reflections a year on from the eruption of the
movement in India, 'The only useful movement against sexual violence can
be one that brings the problem home, right into the comfort zone, that
challenges rather than reassures patriarchy, that exposes the violence found in
the ‘normal’ rather than locating violence in the far-away and exotic. For
people in the US or Europe, it might be reassuring to imagine that sexual
violence and gender discrimination happens ‘out there’ in India, rather than to
look around and question the violence embedded in the ‘normal’ around them. The
questions to ask would be: how does the politics of ‘protecting’ women, and of
propaganda about ‘good and bad women’ play out in advanced capitalist
societies? In what ways are countries like the US and UK complicit in the
violence and discrimination that women face in India or Bangladesh?'
No comments:
Post a Comment